@Anonymous123’s new nick
> one thing feels mistaken with them
Beginning out with a robust argument, I see.
> the code has turn into mainly a mini-os
Nicely yeah, Chrome OS is a factor. That being mentioned, all present browser codebases are the dimensions of working programs.
> a monopoly additionally
The place did Safari and Firefox go rapidly?
Each good and unhealthy, the online could be a worse and method much less interactive place with out JS. With out JS, we might be caught with the online of 1995.
> safety points
As you mentioned your self, the codebase has the dimensions of an working system, so no surprises there.
> bugs and many others continuously getting patched
…which is an efficient factor.
> too standard
That’s not a factor. Folks use what they need to use. Too unhealthy for you that it’s not Deplatformingfox.
> Some individuals really consider that chromium browsers have one of the best safety
It’s not a matter of “perception”, bud. Perception belongs to the realm of faith.
That Chromium has sturdy sandboxing and actual web site isolation shouldn’t be “perception”, it’s truth, verifiable through the open supply code.
> Firefox, will get nowhere close to the safety problems with browsers like Chrome
Yeah, as a result of it’s not a precious goal with 3% market share. Not as a result of it’s well-engineered (which it isn’t, it’s rubbish).
> Firefox, will get nowhere close to the safety problems with browsers like Chrome, Edge, Courageous and Vivaldi.
As a result of no person makes use of it.
> What browser is safer to make use of? Firefox is!
LOL, nope. You possibly can’t have it each methods. You declare Firefox is safe primarily based on its irrelevancy (which is a shoddy argument in itself, however hey, let’s trip with it), however when extra individuals begin utilizing it, it’ll turn into a extra engaging goal of hackers, invalidating the irrelevancy issue.
> Firefox is the one FOSS browser maintained by properly paid builders
Evidently false. Chromium is open supply. So is WebKit. And Deplatformingfox’s devs are literally paid by Google.
> Google chrome is a proprietary browser the place an advert tech firm bloats the code.
So what? Chrome is only a closed supply variant of Chromium, which is open supply. And advert tech? The place do you suppose Mozzarella’s cash comes from? Did I miss the half the place Mozzarella publicly got here out in opposition to advertisements?
> No thanks. Firefox is way safer.
Good advert. Desire a job within the advert tech trade?
High quality of gHacks posts went downhill ever since they mentioned bye bye to fact-based arguments for essentially the most half.