> Not solely does google have the worst browser conceivable
That’s why it’s the most used, as a result of it’s “the worst conceivable”. Some individuals, lol.
If it was really the “worst conceivable”, then individuals would swap to FF in droves. In any case, FF shouldn’t be this hidden luxurious gem no person can afford to have, it’s extensively recognized and will be downloaded free of charge. So why don’t individuals swap? As a result of they see no cause to.
In actuality, Firefox is worse. Shoddy safety practices (pulled underneath the rug as a result of they’re irrelevant sufficient by now that no hacker actually cares), excessive CPU and RAM consumption, not personal in any respect by default, no higher extension choice than Chromium both.
> it generously presents their chromium codebase scraps free of charge
Additionally they revenue from outdoors contributions. Win-win.
> Manifest V3 ? Federated Studying of Cohorts FLoC ? Subjects ?
FLoC –> Not a factor.
Subjects –> May be disabled. If not, then patched out.
Manifest V3 –> Truly improves safety (extensions can now not intercept and alter connections, making spy ware and redirect malware attainable). Courageous has an adblocker in-built, so I don’t actually care.
> Sure, Mozilla doesn’t provide a lot philosophical resistance to googles concepts, however at the least it presents a unique browser engine at this second. lol.
“Not a lot philosophical resistance”? They’re purchased and paid for by Google, Google is paying the month-to-month wage of their devs.
And totally different browser engine? They may assist no matter Google makes use of on Google Search, YouTube, GMail and many others. as in any other case these web sites gained’t work appropriately and Firefox can’t afford that (no browser can). And “totally different engine”, we are able to additionally disable assist for sure net requirements in Chromium downstream forks, simply so you recognize. You don’t want a unique engine to show assist for an online customary on or off.
> Why use a browser (chrome) or browser codebase (chromium) developed and maintained by essentially the most poewerful advert tech firm of all time?
– Net compatibility
All of that are worse with Firefox. Firefox can also be much less personal than some Chromium forks like Courageous on high of that.
> I doubt individuals simply resolve hey i’ll use the google chrome browser, it’s virtually like the choice is already made for them
…sure, as a result of you may’t set up another browser on Home windows or Android, you HAVE TO use Chrome or Edge. /s
Courageous’s huge progress and its place within the Google Play Retailer obtain charts inform a unique story. Firefox simply has no success as a result of it sucks.
> Google’s search adverts are Google’s greatest income generator
And not directly, it’s the supply of Mozilla’s earnings as properly. Ever puzzled why they don’t have an adblocker included by default?
Most individuals aren’t conscious of uBO (6 million customers on FF, give or take – lower than 3% of all FF customers). Together with an adblocker by default like Courageous does can be an apparent optimistic differentiator from Chrome or Edge and can be a straightforward means for Mozilla to enhance person privateness. And but, nothing. Look no additional.
> The cash Google offers to Mozilla is actually nothing in comparison with what they’ll make in a 12 months.
Nothing from Google’s perspective. Every little thing from Mozilla’s perspective. And invaluable for preserving pseudo-opposition round.
> How the hell do you anticipate Mozilla which is a browser developer firm to compete with in all probability the largest advert tech enterprise of all time?
They do compete. Simply with much less high quality (which you at all times deny, you say high quality is superior there).
> Mozillas market share shouldn’t be a lot that it misplaced recognition
They’ve a internet person loss yearly for a decade now.
> it’s extra like chrome is put in by default on android and smartphones are so common now.
Courageous and even Opera each have extra customers on Android than FF.
> Smartphones are reworking society into a sort of technological digitalized jail.
Ah sure. Is dependent upon what OS you run and what apps you utilize, I’d say. An Android-based Customized ROM has first rate app assist, opposite to Linux on the desktop, which makes most individuals keep on Home windows on desktop. Surprise which choice is healthier and extra accessible.
> Method an excessive amount of cameras and mics.
Cameras and Mics? All notebooks and AiOs function these. Or do you imply tower PCs? Out of style, I’d say. Massive and clunky, additionally not moveable.